Ha! That got your attention, didn't it? A post by that same title sure got mine when I followed the link sent to me by PIUGoddess on Twitter. Here's the original article, but I'm going to quote it here entirely so I can tear the author a new asshole respond point-by-point, so you don't need to give them the link love unless you'd like to. I will say this: it was published at MomLogic.
This article was written by a woman named Gina (I couldn't find any other information about her, like is she really a man or maybe just a 22 year old idiot?). So let me address this post to her.
Dear Asshat Gina:
First, let's start with that title. The most polite thing to say, I suppose, is that you clearly don't get it. What is it you aren't getting? Let's start with the top line, Gina:
"I respect women's right to choose, but I have little tolerance for pro-choicers who expect sympathy when they have a miscarriage."
Really? You respect women's right to choose? Unless that choice is to actually try to have a baby and then mourn the potential when that baby is lost? Then you have "little tolerance" for us. Well, guess what, honey? WE DON'T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT YOUR TOLERANCE. We don't ask for it, we don't need it, and we sure as shit could fucking care less if you don't have any tolerance for us.
Ahem. Moving on.
"These are women who put pro-choice buttons on their backpacks in
college and ridiculed pro-lifers for being backward, repressive
religious freaks who want to control the world's uteruses.
Ten years have passed and lo and behold, these women have grown up,
gotten married, and now have the itch to have a baby of their own.
Suddenly the monthly visitor that they were relieved to get when they
were 20, now, at 32, plunges them into the depths of depression."
OH MY GOD. I'm sorry; when we grow up and (as happens quite often!), are we supposed to no longer want to control our own 'uteruses' (actually, Gina, UTERI is the plural of uterus), by, you know, trying to have a baby? SOMEHOW I MISSED THAT MEMO. And let me provide an analogy for loss that perhaps you'll understand... So, say you have a pretty good job you like a lot but then you find a listing for an even BETTER job. You interview for the better job. More than once. You get excited. You start to make plans about what you'll do at the new job, maybe make plans for that salary increase--then, suddenly, you DON'T GET THE JOB. But you still have the one you started with, so don't fucking cry about losing the potential new job, you self-centered little asshole. See? Do you get it now? I didn't think so. Because I think what you really are saying here, Gina, is that we women should be punished for either a) wanting a child in the first place or b) waiting so long to have a child. Interesting. Sooo not your typical Pro-Choicer stance.
"Like vegetarians who eat chicken but not beef, many pro-choice
advocates want it both ways. It's a baby when they want it to be, it's
a bundle of cells when they don't."
Has anyone ever met someone that called themselves a vegetarian and ate chicken? Because I haven't, and that's a stupid fucking analogy.
Secondly, not like you'll get this: when an early miscarriage happens to a woman, she understands that she haven't lost a VIABLE baby. You might be surprised to hear this, but we actually are kind of smart and educated about the realities of pregnancy. Shocker! I know! But that doesn't mean she hasn't watched some dearly held hopes and dreams go down (literally, usually) the toilet. And part of being pro-choice in my mind is thinking women are allowed to have feelings about that loss of hopes and dreams.
And then there are some of us that have lost what is actually physically recognizable as a baby. We are somehow allowed to grieve when our sisters who suffered early miscarriages are not? What kind of "supporter" of women are you if you've decided who ranks on the grief-o-meter and who doesn't? Oh, but you address this in your next section.
"If you believe that pregnancy doesn't produce a baby until some magic
number (13 weeks? 20 weeks? 40?), then you must also agree that it's
ridiculous to break down in hysterics, set up a memorial website for
your "angel," and seek out a grief counselor when you start bleeding in
your first trimester. After all, you're simply talking about the loss
of a conglomeration of microscopic cells, right?! That's hardly
something to cry about."
You know what I think is fucking ridiculous? You getting to decide how women get to feel, you judgmental asshat. Grief is grief is grief. When your cat dies (because somehow, I just know you have a cat), are we supposed to say to you, "It's just an animal. Get over it already! That's hardly something to cry about." How about your grandmother? When she dies, should we say, "Well, jeez, she was old and you already had a lot of time with her." See? YOU DON'T GET TO CHOOSE WHETHER OR NOT WOMEN HAVE SADNESS AND GRIEF.
"Advocate all you want, but don't come crying to me when your hypocrisy
hits you like a ton of bricks. If you are going to defend the right to
abort babies, you don't have the right to be upset when yours dies."
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA... arg. Oh, honey. I can't wait until you get a little bit older and this whole hypocritical post comes back to bite you on the ass. And, once AGAIN, you--whoever you are, anonymous poster at MomLogic that only provided your first name and no additional information--you claim to support a women's right to choose, yet you claim we don't "have the right to be upset."
And here is where I lose all sense of decency and reason and say, simply, GO FUCK YOURSELF.
What gets me the most, anonymous Gina, is that the Pro-Life people I know wouldn't be this cruel to a woman that has experienced a loss. Even if they secretly think that we are hypocritical, they understand the reality and intensity of love we women can have even at the very first moment we realize we are pregnant with a WANTED child. So you, advocate of choice, are actually more nasty and judgmental than a Pro-Lifer. What do you think about that? And I would never dream of telling you how to feel about that accusation. I'm nice like that.
And lastly? I sincerely doubt, my dear, that you actually believe in a woman's right to choose. Because if you did? You would never have said, "defend the rigth to abort babies." Cause you know what? Pro-choicers never use that kind of language. EVER. I think you are a young and inexperienced gung-ho Pro-Lifer that is donning a hat to make a point, and you didn't do it very well.
Not that I have a leg to stand on; I'm being all kinds of bitchy judgmental asshat over here myself. And maybe MomLogic posted this entry by you just to be salacious, and chances are, I am responding to it for the same reason.
It's either that or the fact that your article made my head nearly pop off in rage.
One or the other.
Good luck, Gina, in life--and may no one ever judge you like you've judged those of us that have suffered pregnancy loss yet support a woman's right to choose. Because it SUCKS to be treated the way you just treated me.
Love,
Cecily, who is feeling just a tad snarky today.